Hey there!
I solemnly swear that I am up to no good.
I went into this weekend with coffee, curiosity, and a quiet dare to myself: prove I can partner with AI intentionally, not just casually.
Hitting âSubmitâ on the GH-300 felt less like an end and more like naming a shift Iâd already begunâmoving from âCopilot as autocompleteâ to âCopilot as a disciplined collaborator.â
đŻ Why I Chose GH-300
đ§ How I Prepared: From Practical Know-How to Deeper Mastery
Going into GHâ300, I wasnât starting from scratch. Iâd already been working with GitHub Copilot in real projects, so I knew my way around prompting for bug fixes and completing code blocks. What the study materials gave me was a peek behind the curtainâhow Copilot actually transforms a prompt and surrounding context into suggestions.
That theoretical layer changed how I think about the tool:
1. New feature scaffolding: Drafting starting points for entirely new modules or services, complete with relevant imports and patterns.
2. Test generation: Quickly creating unit and integration tests that follow framework conventions, ready for refinement.
3. Explaining legacy code: Breaking down unfamiliar or dense codebases into plainâlanguage explanations, accelerating onboarding and refactoring.
This prep didnât just make me exam-readyâit rewired how I collaborate with Copilot day to day.
đ Before vs After: Workflow Evolution
Aspect | Before | After |
---|---|---|
Use-cases | Bug fixes, boilerplate | Feature scaffolding, test generation, code explanation |
Prompting style | Minimal, reactive | Intent-driven, contextual, iterative |
Evaluation criteria | "Does it work?" | Correctness, readability, testability, security |
Stack integration | Angular & Spring Boot basics | Full-stack synergy with rich context cues |
Trust level | Occasional suggestions | Strategic collaboration |
đ Study Resources I Used
Happy coding! đ
Cheers,
The Half-Blood Coder
Nox!